4 ms·
Replacing JS may not be technically difficult, but practically it's extremely difficult (IE6, anyone?). Plus JS has got so fast, it's becoming hard to see the p
by gmac 13y ago
Replacing JS may not be technically difficult, but practically it's extremely difficult (IE6, anyone?). Plus JS has got so fast, it's becoming hard to see the point anyway.
- pbsdp 13y ago> Plus JS has got so fast, it's becoming hard to see the point anyway. Native is faster. A lot faster. And that's what browser apps are competing against.
- klibertp 13y agoasm.js ? It's essentially almost typed intermediary language which can be directly/easily translated to CPU instructions.
- rational_indian 13y agoNot fast enough apparently: https://developers.google.com/native-client/ https://developers.google.com/native-client/