4 ms·
Its a huge barrier industry (a huge industry though) that is kept on its needs by NDA's, non-competes and just people not wanting to work. Fiserv, Jack Henry, N
by kirinan 13y ago
Its a huge barrier industry (a huge industry though) that is kept on its needs by NDA's, non-competes and just people not wanting to work. Fiserv, Jack Henry, NCR all keep their customers where they want them, in their pocket, by not providing their data and services to third parties, and not playing nicely with competition. I've worked in this industry for years, and it is very very hard to get anything done when they view you as a threat. If that wasn't enough, PCI-DSS and other challenges in the form of regulation and governance adds another wrench in the gears of innovation when it comes to this industry. I REALLY wish you the best, I know the industry needs more startups and more innovation. I also hope you can get past the regulation and other companies to get the job done, its really needed. BTW If you ever get around to it: ATM Drivers (Transaction Processors) and Core banking systems also need disrupted, they are both completely garbage and only like 50 years old (most of them run on mainframes that are older than pretty much everyone on this site). Socket interfaces, ISO 8583 (Its a proprietary format used by Transaction Processors) and SOAP interfaces that are extremely poorly implemented plague those systems, as well as other extremely terrible problems that come along with terrible design decisions. Enough ranting for today though, You are working on interesting problems, that need to be fixed, so godspeed!
- zt 13y agoThanks for the details and the thoughts. It is a difficult industry, obviously. I think we're fortunate that we're starting as a wrapper around existing exposed endpoints (for example SFTP endpoints for ACH flat-files). Core processing obviously needs innovative competition and we hope to get there if it's necessary (I've heard Palantir is considering getting in to that business as well). SOAP interfaces are exactly what we're trying to get rid of. ISO8583 is likely here to stay though, despite it's problems.
- kirinan 13y agoI can really see why people would want to keep ISO8583, and I can see why it was a good option at the time, but its dated and it shows a lot. I agree with your approach, if I didn't love my current job, I'd apply at Standard Treasury because its a good move. Baby steps into the industry with open interfaces and practices, people will catch on. The thing is, I think the power shift needs to go back to the banks from the vendors. If you can manage that convince them thats the way it should be, you'll win the market.