4 ms·
I think that's fair. AT&T should be reprimanded for a serious lack of security — how much they should be reprimanded would be another topic for debate. But it
by ceol 13y ago
I think that's fair. AT&T should be reprimanded for a serious lack of security — how much they should be reprimanded would be another topic for debate.
But it doesn't take away from weev's crime (both this one and his previous harassments.)
- walid 13y agoSorry for your distorted reality. You're saying that everyone who accesses unsecured information on a badly secured server gets reprimanded. You're placing the onus of security on the user which makes your point pure BS.
- nathan_long 13y agoGranted. But how do you propose that AT&T would ever be reprimanded without someone like weev? I strongly believe that weev should have notified AT&T before Gawker. But if they were unresponsive, as often happens, what then?