5 ms·
Well, he is doing pointillism. How is that going to be better in Photoshop? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointillism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointillism
by npalli 13y ago
Well, he is doing pointillism. How is that going to be better in Photoshop?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointillism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointillism
- rdtsc 13y agoApply a filter. There is a Photoshop filter for it, I am pretty sure. Which again brings us to a discussion point. Would that be art? What if this man spend time building a Photoshop filter and starting applying the "pointillism" filter to random images. What if he wrote a script scraped the web, applied the filter and then published it out in his image archive. Would that be impressive? Would we have heard about him?
- jussij 13y ago> There is a Photoshop filter for it, I am pretty sure In other words find a shortcut. I would say when it comes to art, shortcuts are not the best approach. Anyone could use that Photoshop filter, but it takes real skill to do it by hand.
- npalli 13y agoThat's not what he is doing though. He is actually manipulating the pixels, applying the filter will not give him any control over the pixels. He wants to do pointillism, not achieve a pointillism-like effect on a regular painting.
- rdtsc 13y agoI was being sarcastic.
- alan_cx 13y agoWould you walk up to some one painting, and tell then to get someone else to do it?
- rdtsc 13y agoSorry, I think you misunderstood my intention. I was sarcastic. Read my other post. The GP was saying how well had he spent more hours with Photoshop he could have gotten so much better. Then Parent post said how exactly would have improved the art and my sarcastic response was well just applying a filter.