Incorrect on two counts. It's the international classification code overlap that matters, and likelihood of confusion, not product confusion. There could be no

Incorrect on two counts. It's the international classification code overlap that matters, and likelihood of confusion, not product confusion. There could be no actual confusion here because the FACEMAIL trademark was filed on an intent-to-use basis. And Facebook does have video features. https://www.facebook.com/videocalling/ https://www.facebook.com/videocalling/