4 ms·
Does anyone know what the evidence of the "mass extortion conspiracy" Chevron provided in order to get the judge to accept the subpoena?
by jdc 13y ago
Does anyone know what the evidence of the "mass extortion conspiracy" Chevron provided in order to get the judge to accept the subpoena?
- Roboprog 13y agoThank you. This would seem to be the central question about this. If Chevron in fact has evidence that the "facts" presented in the Equidorian trial were false, then they have pretty good reason to go after somebody for fraud and extortion. Otherwise, if the allegations in Equidor were undeniable, then their case is, what? That somebody "coerced" the judiciary there to look at what was actually happening, and this is somehow unfair to Chevron??? If the premises of the Equidorian case were in fact false, then they have basis to after the "liars". Otherwise, this would seem to be a fishing expedition, the point of which is to harass the whistle-blowers to make an example of them. "Dis is what happens when youz mess wid us, M.....F.....s!". IF there is no evidence of falsehood, that is, if the case against Chevron in Equador is true, the irony of using RICO to harass the whistle-blowers is oh so rich.