4 ms·
There is no comparison to the two though. RubyMotion is about writing native apps where PhoneGap is not.
by millerm 13y ago
There is no comparison to the two though. RubyMotion is about writing native apps where PhoneGap is not.
- 1qaz2wsx3edc 13y agoThere is absolutely a comparison here. Both allow you to build mobile applications for IOS. A single feature like native or not native does not dictate the quality of an application. Also, I was trying to help some guy who only makes 1100/mo.
- millerm 13y agoI'm just responding with my thoughts on this... I don't think native vs. a browser based is a 'single feature'. It's huge. Without access to the SDK's real power you lose a LOT of functionality and performance. I would never deliver a PG app to anyone other than an in-house enterprise app that just gets the job done. Sorry, it's just the way I feel about it. I loath those applications. I won't take shortcuts that save me a little time but at the cost of all my customers being pissed off at a sub-standard application. Again, this is my opinion but I do have empirical evidence in my career that supports my assertions.
- 1qaz2wsx3edc 13y agoPerformance we can debate till the end of days. As for functionality cordova/phonegap has a great plugin framework. Sure you don't get native ui components, but I look at that as an advantage, because if you use web views you can create a uniform approach. The onus of performance is always on the developer, and most likely not the tools.