> Its far from role playing. As I said they were putting anarchist principles in practice. You say they need a leader, they showed they did not need a leader.

> Its far from role playing. As I said they were putting anarchist principles in practice. You say they need a leader, they showed they did not need a leader. He said they need a leader to evangelize. You say they didn't need a leader to organize a coherent group. You might be right, but given that Occupy seemed to me to be a political action movement, and there's been exactly zero substantive political action, we have to consider it as a failure. And apparently that means we have to consider 'anarchist principles' as a failure, unless there is some better explanation of why they failed in this case to drive political improvement.