4 ms·
[…] when Google compared search results pages with 10, 20, and 30 results per page, Mayer said the company found that putting 30 results on a page led to one-fi
by audionerd 17y ago
[…] when Google compared search results pages with 10, 20, and 30 results per page, Mayer said the company found that putting 30 results on a page led to one-fifth fewer searches. Analyzing the data, she said that latency -- the subsecond delay caused by serving more results -- drove the decline.
"Users really care about speed," Mayer said. "They really respond to speed."
http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/google/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208400949 http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/google/showArti...
- brown9-2 17y agoCouldn't the decline in "searches" also just be because more users were finding what they needed in the first page of results?
- sp332 17y agoI'm pretty sure they would have factored that in to the study. Google is very good at counting which link you clicked, and how long it took you to find it.