6 ms·
Instead of voting to block funding for programs, why not repeal the laws that enable those programs in the first place? I don't understand this logic.
by brown9-2 13y ago
Instead of voting to block funding for programs, why not repeal the laws that enable those programs in the first place? I don't understand this logic.
- glesica 13y agoBecause that would be a concrete step that would actually change something and would be a clear signal as to how each representative stands on the issue of unlimited domestic surveillance.
- mcherm 13y agoThe laws do NOT enable the programs. The laws had specific clauses stating that they could not be used for this sort of widespread surveillance of innocent citizens. But the administration has an "interpretation" of the laws which apparently is at odds with the plain text of the law. I can't say HOW they came by this interpretation, because the interpretation of the law is secret. (Yeah... really.) So maybe the power of the purse will still be effective. We can hope.
- brown9-2 13y agoOr Congress could pass new laws that remove any ambiguity that allows for a different "interpretation" than what was intended.
- siddboots 13y agoEven so, they are doing it this way because it is a late amendment to the directly related Defense Appropriations Bill. They can hardly stick clarifications to the Patriot Act on to it. It would be great to "treat the cause, not the symptoms", but they didn't have the immediate opportunity to do that.
- perlpimp 13y agoHow can you repeal secret laws? There were report so secret laws and secret interpretations being used for 'justification' of unconstitutional activities.