3 ms·
It's a bit different with a file system that still undergoes heavy development of basic features... http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2013/04/the-btrfs-backup-expe
by tjoff 13y ago
It's a bit different with a file system that still undergoes heavy development of basic features...
http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2013/04/the-btrfs-backup-experiment/ http://www.anchor.com.au/blog/2013/04/the-btrfs-backup-exper...
Just don't use btrfs where a failure is going to hurt.
- pja 13y agoThat blog post seems remarkably positive to me: "We thrashed this filesystem and pushed some little used features really hard & found a few showstopper bugs that crop up for our use case. We lost no data & discovered a RAID array error that hadn't been picked up before. In summary, btrfs is great, but we can't use it yet."
- tjoff 13y agoYes, it was better than what I would expect. But it completely baffles me that anyone saying that that article seems remarkably positive at the same time as saying btrfs is stable...