2 ms·

That's because the military is supposed to only attack where the trial is a foregone conclusion -- i.e. a soldier actively fighting a war with you. Kinda like t

That's because the military is supposed to only attack where the trial is a foregone conclusion -- i.e. a soldier actively fighting a war with you. Kinda like the cops also shoot at someone with a gun the moment they raise it at them. There is no trial needed when there is clear and present danger, or a formal declaration of war and uniforms. But of course, with terrorism it's all so complicated and confusing, why not just wear lampshades and drink a lot instead of bothering to figure out what is what.

anaptdemise 13y ago
The problem is that we have seen this all before. It is freaking scary to pick up a history book after reading the news. "The Algerian War of Independence does provide such similarities in terms of geography and topography, social makeup, as well as military and insurgent forces at play. The French, however, lost Algeria after eight years of bitter fighting and the subject is further obscured by the emotions surrounding the atrocities by both sides, thus making the collation of objective testimonies difficult. Most confusing, though, are the circumstances specific to a troubled France at the time, such as the profound tensions that existed between citizens in the métropole and French immigrants in Algeria proper, the continued effort to resume its former place as a major power in the world, the collapse of the Fourth Republic in 1958,..."[1] The technology might improve and the tactics might go through a revision or two but what is the possibility of similar outcomes? Is unilateral, and sometimes excessive, force the only possibility? [1]http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/french-counterinsurgency-in-algeria http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/french-counterinsurgenc... [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War#French_counter-insurgency_operations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War#French_counter-ins...

anaptdemise 13y ago

The problem is that we have seen this all before. It is freaking scary to pick up a history book after reading the news. "The Algerian War of Independence does provide such similarities in terms of geography and topography, social makeup, as well as military and insurgent forces at play. The French, however, lost Algeria after eight years of bitter fighting and the subject is further obscured by the emotions surrounding the atrocities by both sides, thus making the collation of objective testimonies difficult. Most confusing, though, are the circumstances specific to a troubled France at the time, such as the profound tensions that existed between citizens in the métropole and French immigrants in Algeria proper, the continued effort to resume its former place as a major power in the world, the collapse of the Fourth Republic in 1958,..."[1] The technology might improve and the tactics might go through a revision or two but what is the possibility of similar outcomes? Is unilateral, and sometimes excessive, force the only possibility? [1]http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/french-counterinsurgency-in-algeria http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/french-counterinsurgenc... [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War#French_counter-insurgency_operations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War#French_counter-ins...