4 ms·
Storage is cheap compared to engineering labour. That's a massive migration (from one DB to another), definitely not worth saving that 300gb. It's still unclea
by achille 13y ago
Storage is cheap compared to engineering labour. That's a massive migration (from one DB to another), definitely not worth saving that 300gb.
It's still unclear how the storage failure was related to the migration. Was the new engine/fs disruptive to the SSD?
- Narkov 13y agoThey mentioned pretty explosive growth so 300GB today may be 3TB next month and 100TB in a few years.
- nknighthb 13y agoThe Old Reader is not a commercial venture. Time and money are not fungible when they're donations. Edit re migration connection: Anything that stresses hardware already close to the edge can trigger a failure.