3 ms·

Yeah that's a slight niggle with Lens using (.). From an "object oriented" point of view it looks like (.) should have higher precedence than the function appl

by tome 13y ago

Yeah that's a slight niggle with Lens using (.). From an "object oriented" point of view it looks like (.) should have higher precedence than the function application, but in Haskell it doesn't.

asdasf 13y ago
That's why I really dislike the tendency for people to use "foo.bar" with Lens instead of "foo . bar". I find the lack of spaces makes it really easy for my brain to slip into OO mode and start forgetting precedence.
- tome 13y ago
  Yeah I'd agree with you there.