3 ms·
"10Gbps Ethernet doesn't run across standard Cat5/6 cable. Instead, you need what is known as an SFP." (edit to include links) http://www.intel.com/content/ww
by danielsiders 13y ago
"10Gbps Ethernet doesn't run across standard Cat5/6 cable. Instead, you need what is known as an SFP."
(edit to include links)
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/network-adapters/converged-network-adapters/ethernet-x540.html http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/network-adapters/conv...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10-gigabit_Ethernet#10GBASE-T https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10-gigabit_Ethernet#10GBASE-T
- eastdakota 13y agoMy mistake. Early draft (with incorrect information) included in the article. Our network guys corrected me. Here's what it's being updated to read: === Finally, while 10Gbps Ethernet can run across standard Cat5/6 cable, we elected to use SFP+ connectors. We chose this to have the flexibility between optical (fiber) and copper connections. Some network card and switch vendors lock down their equipment to only support proprietary SFP+s, which they charge a significant premium for. We spent significant time testing a combination of SFP+ vendors before finding FiberStore, a SFP+ manufacturer from which we could directly source SFP+s at a reasonable price that worked in the network gear we wanted to use.
- danielsiders 13y agoThanks for the timely update.
- brooksbp 13y agoFor anyone interested in copper vs fiber, take some time to read Chapter 1 of Nathan Farrington's dissertation: bnathanfarrington.com/papers/dissertation.pdf As 10Gbps, and even 40G/100G, gain traction, you start running into cable length issues: Attenuation and maximum length of AWG 7 copper wire: Bit Rate (Gb/s), dB/m, Loss/m, Max length (m) 1, 0.721, 15.3%, 106 10, 2.28, 40.8%, 33.5 40, 4.56, 65.0%, 16 100, 7.21, 81.0%, 10.6