That's interesting, I got the exact opposite vibe from marknutter's comment. Considering that the link was about a particular report indicating that climate cha

That's interesting, I got the exact opposite vibe from marknutter's comment. Considering that the link was about a particular report indicating that climate change might be "less severe" than some think, and then subsequent claims that the report was "misleading", I suppose it's not necessarily clear from context which is supposed to be the "bad science" part. I suppose there's a thin line between "trite platitude" and "observant insight". (Which one is this?)