Where I'm more concerned on this topic is the inevitable presence of a non-curated list of those who voluntarily 'opted in' to having the porn faucet unplumbed.

Where I'm more concerned on this topic is the inevitable presence of a non-curated list of those who voluntarily 'opted in' to having the porn faucet unplumbed. The character assassinations and prospective employment undoings we've all read about over the past few years, due to (reasonably) tame publicly available information now may pale in comparison to the damage that could ensue if one were to be labelled a 'voluntary pornographer'. I fear that what has historically been a 'right of passage' may in future be used to retrospectively punish those that can be traced back to such a compelling opt-in. For those of us that can remember when porn wasn't a series of 0's and 1's, we took great delight in sneaking a peak at the 'forbidden' shows on pay-TV after Mom and Dad had gone to bed. We willingly exchanged a tasty sandwich during recess for a roughly torn page from the Hustler mag that little Johnny had smuggled from his older brother. And later, (0's and 1's) delighted in seeing that lush SERP, born from a 4 letter search phrase and the final 14.4k nod of KRSSHHHHHHH, Go for it, You're in!" My right of passage was in the school music room, after hours with Drew Barrymore in 1994 - Lusciously posing for me on the cover December's Penthouse. If Cameron had his way, that memory may now be a piece of data, just waiting to be exploited by a "hacker" collective who do it "for the lulz", or worse, a 1984 style release of public disclosure outing those who were once impure. Who knows what may come now. (pun intended)