3 ms·
Even a opt-in filter on an infrastructure level would imply DPI, and therefore would enable the ability for traffic analysis. And besides it creates a national
by yk 13y ago
Even a opt-in filter on an infrastructure level would imply DPI, and therefore would enable the ability for traffic analysis. And besides it creates a national 'watches porn' list.
- Qantourisc 13y agoIf the filter is opt-in, it's a "doesn't want to watch porn" list :)
- brokenparser 13y agoIn a free market economy, you could provide filtering as a service to those who want it. You get to use whatever setup of proxies and packet sniffers you please, so as long as they don't overstep the users mandate. Routing your other customers past these intermediaries would be a good idea, you can provide each customer the service they want.
- yk 13y agoThat works as long as the ISP faithfully reports the routing rules they use for each user, which is rather hard to verify. ( And it would probably illegal for the ISP to tell their customers, if the government wants to use the DPI equipment.)
- _mulder_ 13y agoMost ISPs already do DPI, albeit lightly. That's how they do 'traffic shaping' against bit torrent, etc.