3 ms·
It's interesting that the spying and the Bostom bombings are mentioned in one breath. How come all that spying did not identify the bombers before the attack?
by linuxhansl 13y ago
It's interesting that the spying and the Bostom bombings are mentioned in one breath. How come all that spying did not identify the bombers before the attack?
With the current foreign policies terrorist attacks are as inevitable as car accidents (albeit far less dangerous).
We accepted car accidents (I do not see a war on driving). And since foreign policy remains largely unchanged it seems we have accepted terrorism as well.
The terrorists have achieved their goal anyway. They instilled fear in the US populous, and set us all on a path to willingly give away our liberties.
We should look at Norway, which kept its cool after the 2011 attacks; that is strong, confident reaction. Ours is one of cowardice; with lemmings like Hayden repeating the party line ad nauseum.
- cheald 13y ago> How come all that spying did not identify the bombers before the attack? Because the current measures aren't sufficient, obviously. We need more power and more tools to monitor everything all the time to prevent tragedies like this in the future. This "transparency culture" and the outmoded laws that tie our hands (when people are watching) are anti-American and cost American lives. (Yes, I am being sardonic.)