4 ms·
Hey, I got a better idea. Let's give each socket a "human-friendly" name. Translating back and forth to the underlying numerical representation should be easy
by jingo 13y ago
Hey, I got a better idea. Let's give each socket a "human-friendly" name. Translating back and forth to the underlying numerical representation should be easy enough.[1]
Heck, we could even create a centralized system for managing our new namespace. OMG, maybe we could charge people money for the names? Yes! We're rich!
And the result: Hundreds of millions of "parked" domains serving up cheap advertising. Simply brilliant!
1. See Hobbit's comments in netcat source code for a differing opinion.
I often wish that people like djb or Hobbit (=low tolerance for nonsense) had designed the systems that we are now stuck with.
Though they are only applications, netcat and ucpsi have aged well and remain a pleasure to use.
- dsl 13y agoNobody is forcing you to use DNS.
- jingo 13y agoHa. That is debatable. Define "force". At the very least, I'd say there is strong coercion. If not in favor of using names, then certainly in favor of deprecating the use of IP and port numbers (e.g., for email). Lemme guess, now you'll say "No one is forcing you to use email."
- jingo 13y agos/ucpsi/djb'"'"'s & applications/
- jingo 13y agos/ucpsi/ucspi/g