4 ms·
Though many see it as science fiction, quantum "programming" shouldn't be excluded from the list. I realize he aimed to generate a practical discussion around
by christianbryant 13y ago
Though many see it as science fiction, quantum "programming" shouldn't be excluded from the list. I realize he aimed to generate a practical discussion around where we are now and what we need to do in the immediate (5 years) future, but just as nanotech really needed to get off the ground in people's heads before it could get a foothold in popular culture as an actual technology, quantum computing is in need of more public analysis and simulation. He might have added a last section there titled "And Beyond..." for topics like this :)
- goldfeld 13y agoAre there technologies aimed at quantum programming available and accessible today, even in a completely experimental status?
- mike_esspe 13y agoQCL: http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~oemer/qcl.html http://tph.tuwien.ac.at/~oemer/qcl.html
- christianbryant 13y agoGood reference point here for QC simulators/environments under multiple languages, but QCL noted below by Mike is probably the best jump start. http://www.quantiki.org/wiki/List_of_QC_simulators http://www.quantiki.org/wiki/List_of_QC_simulators
- mietek 13y agoCheck out Quipper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.5485v1.pdf http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.5485v1.pdf