Freedom of the press protects the right of the press to publish things. It does not[1] protect any agreements made to secure that publishing. If you guarantee

Freedom of the press protects the right of the press to publish things. It does not[1] protect any agreements made to secure that publishing. If you guarantee your source anonymity or a million dollars and you later can't deliver because someone emptied the bank account or eavesdropped or a court compelled you to testify, that has nothing to do with your right to publish. It may affect your ability to publish but so do locked doors and I don't see anyone saying freedom of the press should trump trespassing rules. If bystander Amy is witness to Bob's crime and subpoenaed and under oath she can either tell the court the truth of what happened, perjure herself or not answer and be held in contempt. Freedom of the press, attorney-client and doctor-patient privileges should provide zero protection here. [1] Generally in the US. Many states have shield laws and protected in various other countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_sources http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_sources http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shield_laws_in_the_United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shield_laws_in_the_United_State...