> Neither do I see any other reason to stick with FAT16/32 unless it is somehow required on booting. It is required under UEFI. Fat16 and 32 are the only recog

> Neither do I see any other reason to stick with FAT16/32 unless it is somehow required on booting. It is required under UEFI. Fat16 and 32 are the only recognized file system formats used by UEFI firmware, so you have to have a UEFI system partition using that filesystem. If Microsoft can patent troll people over it, technically that means there is no way to prepare a system for UEFI booting unless running Microsoft software to create a fat partition, and write to it. Which would be stupendous bullshit.