3 ms·
Why do you conclude that they find it acceptable? Shouldn't judges be ruling on the merits of the case, not based on what outcome they find pleasing?
by n09n 13y ago
Why do you conclude that they find it acceptable? Shouldn't judges be ruling on the merits of the case, not based on what outcome they find pleasing?
- charonn0 13y agoThey should indeed. Courts of law should rule on what the law says; the court of public opinion is the proper venue for determining what what the law ought to say.
- igravious 13y agoNo, the court of sound reason is.
- btilly 13y agoWhy do you conclude that they find it acceptable? The majority made their ruling despite lawyers for the other side pointing out this catch-22, and the minority decision outlining this exact scenario as a reason to have granted standing. I do not think that the majority could have so ruled if they found the existence of this catch-22 to be unacceptable.