4 ms·
Wow, I'm as much a skeptic of China's economic model as anyone can be, but this article is just saying words with 1) nothing to back them up, and 2) an overt 'n
by shadowmint 13y ago
Wow, I'm as much a skeptic of China's economic model as anyone can be, but this article is just saying words with 1) nothing to back them up, and 2) an overt 'no, america isn't anything like this! don't be silly!'.
I mean:
(Since someone is going to raise this issue: no, this
bears very little resemblance to the Federal Reserve’s
policies here.
Really? When an article is written as 'factual' in a 'factual' tone, but contains stupid little personal interjections in it like this, I get :'( face about the fall of journalistic standards.
Needs 'opinion piece, may not reflect reality' at the top.
- caseydurfee 13y agoIt says "New York Times: The Opinion Pages" at the top. The headline of the article is "OP-ED COLUMNIST/Hitting China’s Wall." At the bottom of the article it says "A version of this op-ed appeared in print on July 19, 2013"
- fivethree 13y agoThe backing data is Krugman being a nobel prize winning economist whose been incredibly accurate for the last decade and a half. I'm sure you know more than him though shadowmint.
- shadowmint 13y agoBeing famous does not excuse lacking citations.