4 ms·

Yeah, on second thought, you're right. The author is probably just a dick. Screw him.

• rhizome 13y ago
  Right, because the only two options are to accept his argument or think he's a dick.
  • jfarmer 13y ago
    I was responding to the original commenter's claim that Richard was a sociopath by painting a plausible alternative. I was not trying to muster a case for that alternative, except to point out one would just as justified in jumping to my "effective argument" conclusion as one would be in jumping to the "sociopath" conclusion. And, hey, as long as we're jumping to conclusions, why not give the author the benefit of the doubt? If you misunderstood what I was doing, well, c'est la vie. I'm not actually interested in convincing you so much as not having a friend of mine called a sociopath in public without sticking up for him. ;)