4 ms·
wow. very critical comments here, none of which I see are a challenge in overcoming. For example 1. Text in the middle: They could move this to the side or the
by periferral 13y ago
wow. very critical comments here, none of which I see are a challenge in overcoming. For example
1. Text in the middle: They could move this to the side or the bottom or anywhere else since it seems like it is projected. Google Glass cannot do this.
2. Color of text. I'm sure that can be addressed with alternate colors.
3. Cannot take input other than a smartphone: You mean a camera (listed as an option)? Not sure what else would apply
I'm more surprised no one else has positive comments
1. $199 vs $1500
2. Everyone has a phone today. I seriously doubt anyone using glass is giving that up soon. So, why not just tie the device to your phone. Why replace it?
3. Once it is tied to the phone, the app can just communicate with device. If this actually works and gets adoption, app developers will work on integration. The biggest down is that Google will not which means (as someone else pointed out) no maps integration. That would be a shame.
I don't know if this is the product that will make it. But I know they have the right idea over Google in terms of demand. If google made this at $200-$300 instead of glass, I'd have pre-ordered.