4 ms·
I don't think a usability lab is that expensive. A few webcams, a mike, plus a laptop and mobile phone is all you need. That probably totals to at most $3k. Bo
by ttunguz 13y ago
I don't think a usability lab is that expensive. A few webcams, a mike, plus a laptop and mobile phone is all you need. That probably totals to at most $3k.
Both kinds of feedback, lab and cafe, are useful. They each provide a different kind of feedback, from a focused and unfocused user so they aren't mutually exclusive. Rather, both are worthwhile.
- ricardobeat 13y agoKeeping an extra room costs way more than that. It doesn't make any sense for most companies to have a dedicated lab, you're not going to run usability tests all day, every day. Plenty of market research companies offer rooms like this for rent.
- rdouble 13y agoIt doesn't cost that much, really. The salary of the guy running the lab is the largest expense by far. At a startup I worked at a few years ago, they had a lab running 40 hours a week. It would have cost about 10 times as much to have a market research company do this for us if it was even possible.
- drumdance 13y agoA couple companies ago we did it the CEO's office. Over the course of a day we brought in a half dozen people recruited from Craigslist. That one day alone gave us a lot of useful info.
- 100k 13y agoMy point is that the article calls for post-Series A companies to have "a soundproofed room with a table in the center flanked by two chairs, one for a user and one product manager or UX researcher" with "a constellation of web cams". You don't need that to get value. Initial investment for "lost our lease" usability testing is $99 for Screenflow and $70 for a Snowball USB microphone. It would help to do the test in a room that's not full of people, but grab a conference room, or do it after work. There's no reason a bootstrapped startup can't afford this -- in fact, there's an argument to be made that they can't afford NOT to do it.