It's not about the efficiency itself. It's about the constitutional questions that were punted, back when inefficiency made them implausible and thus unnecessa

It's not about the efficiency itself. It's about the constitutional questions that were punted, back when inefficiency made them implausible and thus unnecessary to consider. So it's not the increased efficiency itself, it's that the efficiency has put the problems we tried to ignore directly in front of us. And thus we can't sit back and allow "logical extension of the old system" as justification for allowing it, because, again, the old system was only allowed because the scale necessary for abuse was implausible at the time.