3 ms·
I don't think they should be given credence, either. But I think everything looks like a nail because everything is a nail. That is, every behavior can be expla
by jrs99 13y ago
I don't think they should be given credence, either. But I think everything looks like a nail because everything is a nail. That is, every behavior can be explained by evolution. We just might not have the right one for a specific behavior.
- StavrosK 13y agoMaybe you just evolved to think that.
- jrs99 13y agoI certainly believe that I have!
- StavrosK 13y agoThen we can never convince each other of anything! But, since we know people convince each other of things routinely, the original premise P is a contradiction, therefore not P. I'm glad we agree, let's go for drinks.
- jrs99 13y agoI wish I weren't a logician!
- StavrosK 13y agoYour wish has been granted.
- Gobitron 13y agoThe Theory of Evolution does not say this. In fact, the Theory is predicated on the existence of randomness and adaptation. What you're suggesting is that every behavior has a reason for existence, which is almost the opposite of the Theory of Evolution.
- jrs99 13y agoWhere else would a behavior come from if it weren't purely molecular? The reason for a behavior might be that it is from a random mutation that even survived by random chance.