coherent, but not sensible. seemed like not much more than far-fetched idealism. i simply cannot envision a kind of society where information would not be free

coherent, but not sensible. seemed like not much more than far-fetched idealism. i simply cannot envision a kind of society where information would not be free and in a "protected" or isolated sort of state as he wishes. i have not dug into his philosophy deeply, however, i cannot comprehend how you would prevent information "looting". maybe in a society of free of hackers...