3 ms·
This is a very thoughtful answer. I don't think I ever thought of a college as made up of so many different groups, though it seems more obvious now. It's inte
by pixelart 13y ago
This is a very thoughtful answer. I don't think I ever thought of a college as made up of so many different groups, though it seems more obvious now.
It's interesting that you see one of the primary motivations as competition. Is this competitiveness mostly from the administration and researchers? Who benefits from a college being better than others? Do the administrators get paid more or do the researchers get published more easily? I'm interested in how all the motives and structures break down.
With regard to your last paragraph - adult life certainly does mean very different things to different people. However, I think almost everyone agrees that financial independence and stability is important. I'm going to quote another paragraph from patio11:
"No college will actually do this (quantify the value of a degree by major) because transparency goes directly against their interests: if all degrees from a particular institution are valued at “An uncertain, but certainly large and roughly constant number”, then the standard practice of pricing them all identically makes sense."
That lack of transparency seems careless on the part of the colleges. To me, it actually seems malicious, though that might be going too far. It seems obvious that undergraduate students should be more aware of their financial prospects after graduation, but it seems like no one in the system cares.
- impendia 13y ago> Who benefits from a college being better than others? Everyone. Basically, everyone wants to be surrounded by smarter, harder-working, and more talented people. > do the researchers get published more easily? No, this doesn't matter. Publishing is mostly fair, and to the extent it's not, people are biased in favor of people they know more than universities. >It seems obvious that undergraduate students should be more aware of their financial prospects after graduation, but it seems like no one in the system cares. Perhaps so. But this depends on individual choices. Frankly, given the bleak job market here, I think that the first step motivated graduating seniors at USC should take is to leave South Carolina permanently --- but individual choices may vary. Needless to say the university administration will not recommend this to its students, and neither should I except on an individual basis. That said, this reflects my extreme biases. Just as I was a straight-A student and don't have a very good understanding of how to do the minimal amount of work to pass, I don't really understand what is required to get and succeed in an "okay" job.