3 ms·

Translation: Last time we shared a patch, someone poached our developer, since then I've forbidden to publish patches. To someone asking if it wasn't more of

by byroot 13y ago

Translation: Last time we shared a patch, someone poached our developer, since then I've forbidden to publish patches. To someone asking if it wasn't more of an internal issue: https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/357588819287093248 I'm not interested in talking about that. Then later he rant about "the true motivation of GitHub".

ekurutepe 13y ago
He must be a great boss to work for. Next step: forbid developers to tweet and to write blogs…
- kordless 13y ago
  ...and block access to Hacker News!
- aroch 13y ago
  Oles is pretty much insane, having interacted with him (albeit indirectly) a couple times
lechatleon 13y ago
Indeed, not exactly "open source" but "Github". cf : https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283 https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283
- byroot 13y ago
  Yeah, it become clear tweet after tweet, that his obsession is something like: "GitHub is a tool to steal developers".
  - ekurutepe 13y ago
    yes my preciousss they wantsss to steal our developersssss. :)
RyanZAG 13y ago
Sounds like that developer dodged a bullet. Anybody else working for him should take the hint.
theboywho 13y ago
This is not an accurate translation. Here you go: "The last time we shared a patch, they ended up poaching our guy. Since then, I've forbidden to publish diffs"
- Tobu 13y ago
  Patch and diff mean the same thing in this context, AMHA the original translation is a legitimate clarification. But guy does work better.
lechevalierd3on 13y ago
And when he is asked if the problem should be to keep the employees rather than hide them he added "the subject does not interest me enough to continue the discussion". Whaaa OVH--; https://twitter.com/arcanis/status/357587837446656000 https://twitter.com/arcanis/status/357587837446656000
Timothee 13y ago
For extra context, the company that poached a developer was Google: https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283 https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283 Translation: "To get your best staff poached by Google, just let them publish patches on github.com". I find it interesting/odd to blame GitHub. (he does in a later tweet, saying it let them see the "real GitHub") Anyway, just some good ol' drama.

by byroot 13y ago

ekurutepe 13y ago

He must be a great boss to work for. Next step: forbid developers to tweet and to write blogs…

kordless 13y ago
...and block access to Hacker News!
aroch 13y ago
Oles is pretty much insane, having interacted with him (albeit indirectly) a couple times

lechatleon 13y ago

Indeed, not exactly "open source" but "Github". cf : https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283 https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283

byroot 13y ago
Yeah, it become clear tweet after tweet, that his obsession is something like: "GitHub is a tool to steal developers".
- ekurutepe 13y ago
  yes my preciousss they wantsss to steal our developersssss. :)

RyanZAG 13y ago

Sounds like that developer dodged a bullet. Anybody else working for him should take the hint.

theboywho 13y ago

This is not an accurate translation. Here you go: "The last time we shared a patch, they ended up poaching our guy. Since then, I've forbidden to publish diffs"

Tobu 13y ago
Patch and diff mean the same thing in this context, AMHA the original translation is a legitimate clarification. But guy does work better.

lechevalierd3on 13y ago

And when he is asked if the problem should be to keep the employees rather than hide them he added "the subject does not interest me enough to continue the discussion". Whaaa OVH--; https://twitter.com/arcanis/status/357587837446656000 https://twitter.com/arcanis/status/357587837446656000

Timothee 13y ago

For extra context, the company that poached a developer was Google: https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283 https://twitter.com/olesovhcom/status/301964179890401283 Translation: "To get your best staff poached by Google, just let them publish patches on github.com". I find it interesting/odd to blame GitHub. (he does in a later tweet, saying it let them see the "real GitHub") Anyway, just some good ol' drama.