2 ms·
Their philosophy is that some people are better suited to judge usefulness than others. They apparently believe that a one-developer, one-vote system would not
by jjindev 13y ago
Their philosophy is that some people are better suited to judge usefulness than others. They apparently believe that a one-developer, one-vote system would not judge such questions "correctly."
- ronaldx 13y ago> They apparently believe that a one-developer, one-vote system would not judge such questions "correctly." I find this dichotomy fascinating. They do a fair job of justifying that democratic voting doesn't generally identify useful questions, but then again the site's main feature is a one-person, one-vote system.