3 ms·
> This guy's son was a bad enough dude that he got put on a terrorist kill list. That's exactly what I responded to. I ignored your conclusion, because of you
by Volpe 13y ago
> This guy's son was a bad enough dude that he got put on a terrorist kill list.
That's exactly what I responded to. I ignored your conclusion, because of your invalid premise.
- briancaw2 13y agoI think we're nitpicking here. I think that the probability of someone not being impartial given their son was on a kill list is greater than someone who's son wasn't...etc. Anyway, I 100% agree that "there is a burden of proof on me to explain why, by killing that someone my action is righteous, legal and moral"