3 ms·
> Brynjolfsson and McAfee are not Luddites. No, but you try to force that argument by calling your article "How Technology Is Destroying Jobs". I don't see any
by skore 13y ago
> Brynjolfsson and McAfee are not Luddites.
No, but you try to force that argument by calling your article "How Technology Is Destroying Jobs". I don't see any citation in the article doing the same. They just matter-of-factly state what is happening and it's the author of the article trying to somehow convert that into a Luddite case.
I find it fascinating how this kind of sentiment is often uttered by Americans. Other western countries have long accepted the fact that we should better put the rewards of technological progress into a social system that at least takes care of the people who cannot anymore contribute to the workforce. In the US, the delusion of full employment for everyone as part of the fight against evil socialism seems strong as ever. I suppose it works as a good scare.
- true_religion 13y agoOne can think that technology destroys jobs, but still not be a Luddite because they support the change that technology brings. An example would be people who are looking forward to the technological singularity which will make all work obsolete, and usher in a utopia.
- skore 13y agoNo, I think "destroy" carries a clearly negative connotation. The people cited in the article talk about jobs becoming obsolete. The author talks about jobs being destroyed.