4 ms·
Argh, another brain imaging study proving nothing. What any of these fMRI studies measure is energy consumption of brain structures. Energy consumption != usef
by tlb 18y ago
Argh, another brain imaging study proving nothing.
What any of these fMRI studies measure is energy consumption of brain structures. Energy consumption != useful thinking. Their conclusion is exactly like saying: my screensaver causes my CPU to get warm, therefore it is doing useful computation.
- joeyo 18y agoWhile I enjoy hating on fMRI studies as much as the next guy, it's a little harsh to say that this study proves nothing. Brain activity is proportional to blood flow/energy consumption. We can argue about the linearity of that relationship, the spatial and temporal resolution, the problems of averaging to increase signal-to-noise and other interpretational issues, but it is still a proxy for neuronal activity. To use your analogy, I'd say it's more like looking at the spatial distribution of temperature in your CPU. Even if it's just driving the screensaver, at least now you know something about which registers are involved. Likewise, the authors in this study have implicated a couple of areas as being involved in the process of daydreaming. Where I would criticize this study, is the part where they conclude that there is a connection between daydreaming and problem solving on the basis that executive function areas are active during daydreaming. It's a suggestive link, but very tenuous.