4 ms·
I believe that what he meant (Correct me if I'm wrong), is that instead of creating a system of classes that tries to abstract everything out of the DOM, it's b
by pothibo 13y ago
I believe that what he meant (Correct me if I'm wrong), is that instead of creating a system of classes that tries to abstract everything out of the DOM, it's better act on the DOM itself, via jQuery, Zepto.js, etc.
In some ways, what I showed in the post is functional.
- Select a DOM i.e var $elem = $("#anElementId")
- Act on it i.e $elem.fadeOut()
- platz 13y agoAnd yet what about the "JQuery soup" problem that everyone complains about? Isn't that due to having DOM manipulation code strewn about willy-nilly?
- pothibo 13y agoSometimes, it's good to encapsulate stuff into a class when you have a complex logic around a specific theme. It's not one or the other. It's one AND the other.