I produce academic papers for a living, and when you call me "insincere" for claiming that the audience of these papers is other experts in an extremely narrow

I produce academic papers for a living, and when you call me "insincere" for claiming that the audience of these papers is other experts in an extremely narrow field, you're just proving that you're not listening to me. > Nothing is "too hard". Well, lots of things are too hard for me. I don't read papers in quantum physics, biochemistry, or pretty much any specialized field of science. And I don't even try to read papers outside of my subfield. Because I don't have the years of expertise necessary to understand them. That's just the way the world works. Things are hard. > You seem to be blindly asserting that academic papers somehow magically get turned into documentation No, I didn't say that they get turned into documentation. Go look at what I said.