Ah, I get it. You're still riding this wave: https://plus.google.com/+EricSchmidt/posts/XfgQ1PXzM5g https://plus.google.com/+EricSchmidt/posts/XfgQ1PXzM5g It's

Ah, I get it. You're still riding this wave: https://plus.google.com/+EricSchmidt/posts/XfgQ1PXzM5g https://plus.google.com/+EricSchmidt/posts/XfgQ1PXzM5g It's a non-denial denial and Eric Schmidt is the last person I'd trust to be truthful on the matter. Deny doing something you weren't actually accused of doing, but that sounds enough like it, so that you don't have to deny doing the thing you actually did. "Nope! Not Direct!" SFTP, virtualized access, automated access - it's all the same but as long as they can find something to deny, they'll run with it. Accuracy matters when you need to spin the lie. You're talking about arguing for the sake of arguing but that's exactly what you're doing. You can play cheerleader and spin the lies the PR masters put out and I'll continue to read the leaked documents for the truth.