Hi Chris, Instarepl is an awesome idea. If someone were to implement an insta-repl as an IntelliJ plugin, or an emacs plugin, what remaining advantages would

Hi Chris, Instarepl is an awesome idea. If someone were to implement an insta-repl as an IntelliJ plugin, or an emacs plugin, what remaining advantages would LT have? Is there something about the architecture of existing IDEs that is incompatible with an insta-repl? Say I'm writing a medium size webapp, like, say, Gmail, in clojure + clojurescript. I don't understand how integrating my app into LT is going to 10x my productivity, outside of instarepl. Or being able to on-the-fly extend my IDE. Emacs can do that, and its not exactly a feature i can't live without. It just seems like all the things you're talking about on the list, like [commands, settings, threading models, plugins, UX] are previously solved problems.