4 ms·
I really love the philosophy of LightTable and will make a serious attempt with 0.5 to make it part of my standard dev workflow, but I keep wishing it had a sin
by drcode 13y ago
I really love the philosophy of LightTable and will make a serious attempt with 0.5 to make it part of my standard dev workflow, but I keep wishing it had a single-stepping debugger built in, especially for clojure code. Am I doing something wrong that I keep depending on such an old-timey feature?
Again, thanks for the great work and sorry for talking about even more functionality (the existing LightTable is just so cool that I'd love to have it be even more awesome by including my favorite features :-)
- ibdknox 13y agoI'm not sure I'll do it, but that's my answer for almost everything at this point. Ultimately this is why I'm taking the strategy I am - plugins will be able to do anything I can do quickly and efficiently. Integrating a step-wise debugger won't be a completely trivial amount of work, but I'd be surprised if it took more than a few days and it's something anyone should be able to do :) After 0.5, my goal is to remove us as a bottleneck as quickly as possible and then who knows what'll happen :D
- moneyrich 13y agohow do you even get .4 into table mode? how much has your priorities changed from things like, being a always having the docs available and new editor features like table mode, now that you have to deal with all these customers? what are your thoughts on doing software projects on kickstarter after doing one?