7 ms·
Nice you are probebly reading this, I'll ask here. I have started to use LT for some clojure/clojure script development and real like it. As much as you can lik
by nickik 13y ago
Nice you are probebly reading this, I'll ask here. I have started to use LT for some clojure/clojure script development and real like it. As much as you can like something that new, but I really belive it will replace everything, not just for development but also for 'normal' stuff.
There is one simple change that I would really like to see. In the Instarepl and the normal result that are shown 'in line', the result is just printed and not pretty printed, witch makes it almost useless in case of a complex datastructure. Is there any reason for that? Can I change that?
Im developing something that looks like a boardgame, and seeing the result of a function with a board in it is almost useless, I still have to pprint it to see whats going on.
- ibdknox 13y agoIt's something I was going to work on for 0.5. I do a fair number of things to make lazy seqs not blow everything up and pprinting will force lazy seqs to be realized causing all sorts of nastiness. There may be some decent middle ground in there somewhere though.
- nickik 13y agoAh, I see how this could be a problem. Maybe show it the like now, and then if you click on it one could pprint it. Does print-length work with pprint?
- aviflax 13y agoFipp might be relevant: https://github.com/brandonbloom/fipp https://github.com/brandonbloom/fipp
- ibdknox 13y agoFipp is awesome and I'd love to use it, but there doesn't appear to be a clojurescript implementation of finger trees and last I knew he hadn't solved the print-length/depth problem either.
- brandonbloom 13y agoI'll solve the print-length/depth problem, if you write the ClojureScript port of finger trees!