4 ms·
All 11 years of my work experience thus far is in the defense industry, so keep that in mind as I state the following. I have yet to see an instance where sala
by vonmoltke 13y ago
All 11 years of my work experience thus far is in the defense industry, so keep that in mind as I state the following.
I have yet to see an instance where salary scaled 1:1 with time put in. Where I used to work, the people that busted their asses for 50+ hours week in and week out, showing they were "team players", might get a 6% raise at review time instead of a 2% raise for a strict 8-5 engineer. They might also get a few thousand in extra bonuses, if their department has funding for them. After a while they might get to the point where they were making enough extra to justify the effort, but "a while" could be 10 years or more.
Note that I am specifically avoiding any discussion of non-monetary considerations and that my analysis sounds rather mercenary. I am specifically trying to address the issue of engineers making more money for being expected to put in more effort. Discussion of the non-monetary considerations could be a lengthy tangent on its own.
- kyllo 13y agoI have yet to see an instance where salary scaled 1:1 with time put in Agreed, and I also have yet to see an instance where productivity scaled 1:1 with time put in. So, it works out. :)
- vonmoltke 13y agoQuite true. There were many in the workaholic group who could have cut multiple hours off their weeks by working smarter.
- hgh 13y agoThe 4% difference compounds reasonably well. Suppose you start at $80k and work at the company for 5 years. After five years the strict 8-5 eng in your example is making $87k--barely keeping up with inflation--and the hard worker is making $101k. The total compensation difference over 5 years is $35k. Unfortunately, real world compensation schemes often don't even work out as well as your example...
- comrade_ogilvy 13y agoIndeed, a 4% difference compounds quite well. Unfortunately many people imagine they might get a 3% or 4% net bump, when they are really going to get 1% extra. Working an extra 20% so that you are paid appropriately larger salary 19 years down the line is not a terrible choice if you really need the money. It is also possible you will earn true grade improvement along the way and get a one time additional bump of 5% for your effort. Of course, if we reverse the equation, things might look differently. I have about 3 potential free hour per workday and 12 free hours per weekend day, for a net 39 hours of "my own time", earned by showing up to work. Giving 10 hours of those to the employer is a "pay cut" of 25%.