3 ms·
Both USA and UK collect DNA data from the new-born children just after their birth. Yes, the New World Order. This surveillance and all.. They want everybody t
by conductor 13y ago
Both USA and UK collect DNA data from the new-born children just after their birth. Yes, the New World Order.
This surveillance and all.. They want everybody to be under total and permanent control. We must stop it, while we can. Yes, adjust your priorities, freedom is much more important than security.
- eliasmacpherson 13y agoI know that's true about people detained at a police station in the UK[0], but new borns? What database does their dna go in to? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_National_DNA_Database https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_National_DNA_Da... EDIT: correct me if I'm wrong, but it isn't mandatory either, which your comment implies.
- arethuza 13y agoProbably this one: http://newbornbloodspot.screening.nhs.uk/ http://newbornbloodspot.screening.nhs.uk/ Mind you - it looks like a pretty sensible project, but I can see how people might have privacy concerns about it.
- eliasmacpherson 13y agoIf you can't get them with insider trading like Naccio, radiation poisoning like Litvinenko or cancer like Jobs, this could prove an effective option in the future :P http://www.examiner.com/article/csi-fraud-fake-dna-evidence http://www.examiner.com/article/csi-fraud-fake-dna-evidence
- daxelrod 13y agoThis seemed hard to believe for the US, but then I found a source: http://www.aclu.org/free-speech-technology-and-liberty-womens-rights/newborn-dna-banking http://www.aclu.org/free-speech-technology-and-liberty-women... . I have not yet been able to find a list of states that do this. The premise is that newborns are screened for genetic diseases, but the samples are then kept, sometimes indefinitely.