2 ms·
> I did not mean to call Torvalds names. Apparently I wasn't careful enough in my wording. _This_ is the problem. We're all engineers here, right? We appreciat
by Quarrelsome 13y ago
> I did not mean to call Torvalds names. Apparently I wasn't careful enough in my wording.
_This_ is the problem. We're all engineers here, right? We appreciate that swearing in such a fashion is a concrete implementation of an abstract concept. The abstract concept of scorn or vehement disagreement. It just so happens your implementation was a little off before:
"Apparently I wasn't careful enough in my wording"
... but even if you tidy it up, its still the same abstract.
This post more or less proves his entire point. I can wander around in a professional capacity and utterly slaughter people with fancy sounding words because my implementation of scorn is _very_ sly when I'm in enterprise. Yours is IDENTICAL.
> socially inacceptable
> fall into a rage
> yelling angrily
> see a psychiatrist
> Not as an insult
> learn some coping strategies
> get along better with other people
That is all 100% unadulterated scorn. It's incredibly, incredibly personally _offensive_..... but your implementation is sly so it's acceptable in a "professional" environment.
Personally I prefer Linus's implementation as its more straight-forward and its easier to see what he's thinking making it more clear how he feels if one were to work together with him.