4 ms·
> I would have to hunt you down and kill you Attempts at off-the-cuff witty death threats don't tend to work too well online. I truly hope you were jesting.
by buro9 13y ago
> I would have to hunt you down and kill you
Attempts at off-the-cuff witty death threats don't tend to work too well online. I truly hope you were jesting.
- jacques_chester 13y agoOff-the-cuff witty death threats are a long-standing tradition of internet debate amongst programmers. Not for nothing do we repeat the unknown wit who observed that one should: Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.
- jalfresi 13y agoApologies, yes it was an attempt at humor. I was hoping for more of a discussion on the two approaches though if your still game.
- buro9 13y agoSure. My scenario is a web service, that calls other web services. It throws an error and then has to return something meaningful to the callee, which is usually both a message that tells the developer calling the web service how to fix it (if it's something that they can fix) as well as the relevant response code. The advantage from assigning the code at the earliest point the error is detected is that one avoids any later text parsing of the error message to figure out the right code to return. It also allows general switching on the error code range to see whether you really need to throw the error or whether there is some other branch of logic that could be done instead.