4 ms·
It's good, but it's not US Constitution good. None of the companies involved should obey the law in this matter, and they should adhere to their moral responsib
by tomelders 13y ago
It's good, but it's not US Constitution good. None of the companies involved should obey the law in this matter, and they should adhere to their moral responsibilities and reveal everything they know.
Plus, I doubt locking up the CEO's of the worlds largest tech companies would work out well for any government.
- oleganza 13y ago"None of the companies involved should obey the law in this matter" Lets see how you will behave when people with guns tell you they will take your property and probably you for not obeying the orders.
- tomelders 13y agoIf it get's that far, then it's safe to assume I've already lost the fight and I'm probably behind bars or dead. Let's see what you do.
- rfctr 13y agoMoral laws are sooooo vastly different among people that an attempt to adhere to them will equal to general anarchy.
- tomelders 13y agoexcuses excuses
- mratzloff 13y agoIf they were arrested, they wouldn't be arrested for "failure to comply with national security requirements" or whatever. They would more likely be arrested for insider trading or something equally plausible.
- adrr 13y agoDon't think current administration would risk that, republican controlled house is looking for any shred of a scandal to have hearings, they are itching to impeach Obama. More than likely you'll see the executive branch would do any business(advertising etc) with yahoo and military would do some knee jerk reaction like ban armed serviced personnel from viewing yahoo properties similarly to what they did with the Guardian. Its easier and safer to cut the money streams. Luckily for Yahoo it isn't much, unlike Microsoft or Att who have more to lose in terms of government contracts.