You've said nothing that disproves anything in the article. You are fallaciously reversing the logic: they don't say or imply that all drinkers are more creativ

You've said nothing that disproves anything in the article. You are fallaciously reversing the logic: they don't say or imply that all drinkers are more creative. They say that some people are more creative when drinking. Many great artists have been known to be drinkers. Many people have thought themselves great artists when they were in fact just great drinkers. You may argue that nothing in favor of drinking is worth the possible cost, but you are not doing that very effectively at the moment.