That makes sense. As I said in my other thread, I locally deal with that problem by passing null instead of a primitive (though admittedly, I would probably use

That makes sense. As I said in my other thread, I locally deal with that problem by passing null instead of a primitive (though admittedly, I would probably use a primitive in cases of bool). That said, in this circumstance my method sounds more like a hack and yours the cleaner, correct route.